Impact of E-Governance in a Developing Country: The Case of E-Mutation in Bangladesh
Main Article Content
Abstract
Like other developing countries, the government of Bangladesh has, in the past two decades, prioritized the adoption of e-governance reforms, a notable example of which is e-mutation. The objective of this paper is to perform a holistic assessment of the impact of e-mutation on end-users and service providers by utilizing a framework that incorporates multiple impact assessment criteria for both sets of stakeholders. Exploratory sequential mixed method and quantitative method were used respectively to assess impact on service providers and end-users. Findings indicate that e-mutation has been highly effective in enhancing quality of service and facilitating process improvements, while significantly reducing the scope for corruption. However, the initiative has achieved little success in improving the experience of end-users when interacting with service providers. It has also failed to promote interoperability among the different governmental organs responsible for land administration. The study, therefore, highlights that policy makers in developing countries should prioritize integration at the design stage and behavioral training at the development stage when considering e-governance reforms. It also makes a theoretical contribution by proposing the inclusion of interoperability in impact assessment frameworks for developing countries, since failure to achieve the same is attributable to the weak institutional context of such countries.
Metrics
Downloads
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
License Agreement for Bangladesh Journal of MIS (BJMIS)
Based on Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0)
All articles published in the Bangladesh Journal of MIS (BJMIS) are licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Key Features of the License
1. Attribution:
- Users must provide appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the Bangladesh Journal of MIS.
- A link to the license must be included, along with an indication of any changes made to the content.
- Attribution must be provided in a reasonable manner but must not imply endorsement by the author(s) or the journal.
2. NonCommercial Use Only:
- Content can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon) for non-commercial purposes only.
3. No Additional Restrictions:
- The license prohibits imposing legal or technological restrictions that limit others from exercising the rights granted under CC BY-NC 4.0.
Author Rights
- Authors retain copyright over their work.
- By submitting their work to BJMIS, authors grant the journal the right to publish the article under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0 license.
- Authors are encouraged to share their work through institutional repositories, personal websites, or other platforms, ensuring proper attribution to BJMIS.
Limitations of the License
- The license applies only to the articles published by BJMIS.
- It does not cover third-party content (e.g., images, tables, datasets) included in the articles unless explicitly stated.
- Users must comply with all applicable laws and ensure their use does not infringe upon the rights of others.
How to Attribute
When using content from BJMIS, please include the following attribution:
Author(s), “Article Title,” Bangladesh Journal of MIS, [Volume, Issue, Year], DOI/URL, licensed under CC BY-NC 4.0.
Further Information
For detailed information about the CC BY-NC 4.0 license, visit the Creative Commons website at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
How to Cite
Plaudit
References
Abdulnabi, S. M. (2024). Issues and challenges of implementing e-governance in developing countries: a comprehensive analysis of civil service models. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2340579
Alam, K. M., Rahman, J. M. A., Tasnim, A., & Akther, A. (2022). A blockchain-based land title management system for Bangladesh. Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences, 34(6), 3096-3110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2020.10.011.
Amritesh., Misra, S. C., & Chatterjee, J. (2013). Applying gap model for bringing effectiveness to e-government services: A case of NeGP deployment in India. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 9(3), 43-57. doi:10.4018/jegr.2013070103
Belwal, R., & Al-Zoubi, K. (2008). Public centric e‐governance in Jordan. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 6(4), 317-333. DOI: 10.1108/14779960810921123
Bhatnagar, S. C., & Singh, N. (2010). Assessing the impact of e-government: a study of projects in India. Information Technologies and International Development, 6(2), 109–127.
Bhuiyan, S. H. (2011). Modernizing Bangladesh public administration through e-governance: Benefits and challenges. Government Information Quarterly, 28, 54-65. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2010.04.006
Bribery rampant in land offices. (2015, August 24). The Daily Star. https://www.thedailystar.net/frontpage/bribery-rampant-land-offices-131533
Cabinet congratulates PM for country winning UNPSA award for the first time. (2020, June 25). The Daily Star. https://www.thedailystar.net/country/news/cabinet-congratulates-pm-country-winning-unpsa-award-the-first-time-1920193
Choi, H., Park, M. J., Rho, J. J., & Zo, H. (2016). Rethinking the assessment of e-government implementation in developing countries from the perspective of the design–reality gap: Applications in the Indonesian e-procurement system. Telecommunications Policy, 40(7), 644-660. doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2016.03.002
Choudhury, E., Ridwan, M., Awal, M., & Hosain, S. (2011). A web-based land management system for Bangladesh [Paper presentation]. 14th International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT 2011), Dhaka, Bangladesh. doi: 10.1109/ICCITechn.2011.6164807.
Choudrie, J., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2005). Investigating the research approaches for examining technology adoption issues. Journal of Research Practice, 1(1), Article D1. http://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/view/4/7
Chowdhury, S. A. (2019). Program evaluation on e-mutation. Ministry of Land.
De’, R. (2006). Evaluation of e-government systems: Project assessment vs development assessment. In Wimmer, M.A., Scholl, H.J., Grönlund, Å., Andersen, K.V. (Eds.), Electronic Government EGOV 2006. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/11823100_28
Gupta, K. P., Singh, S., & Bhaskar, P. (2018). Citizens' perceptions on benefits of e-governance services. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 10(1), 24-55. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEG.2018.091261
Halid, S. N., Hassim, J. Z., Nawawi, YM. T. R. T. (2022). Transforming land administration through e-government. Jurnal LAND, 10(1), 1-24. https://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/land/article/view/22998
Hasan, M. I. (2017). Land administration in Bangladesh: Problems and analytical approach to solution. International Journal of Law, 3(2), 44-49.
Hasan, S. M. M., & Gourab, ASM. R. H. (2023). Impacts of e-mutation: A study on service recipients’ perception. BIGM Journal of Policy Analysis, 1(1), 69-80.
Hassan, M. R. (2013). E-Governance and E-Government in Bangladesh: performance, challenges and remedies. Asian Journal of Applied Science and Engineering, 2(3), 210-216.
Heckathorn, D. D. (2011). Snowball versus respondent driven sampling. Sociol Methodol, 41(1), 355-366. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9531.2011.01244.x
Heeks, R. (2003, February). Most eGovernment for development projects fail: How can risks be reduced? (iGovernment Working Paper No. 14). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3540052
Heeks, R. (2005). e-Government as a Carrier of Context. Journal of Public Policy, 25(1), 51-74.
Hooda, A., & Singla, M. L. (2021). Core – competencies – a key to future – oriented and sustainable e-governance implementation: a mixed method research, Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 15(1), 80-107. DOI: 10.1108/TG-12-2019-0122
Hossain, M. (2015). Improving land administration and management in Bangladesh. Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies.
Irani, Z., Love, P. E. D., Elliman, T., Jones, S., & Themistocleous, M. (2005). Evaluation of e-government: Learning from the experiences of two UK local authorities. Information Systems Journal, 15(1), 61–82.
Islam, S. , Moula, G., & Islam, M. (2015). Land rights, land disputes and land administration in Bangladesh—A critical study. Beijing Law Review, 6, 193-198. doi: 10.4236/blr.2015.63019.
Johansen, E. (2023). A study of the impacts of e-governance on the economy, trends, and perspectives. Munich Personal RePEc Archive. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/116884/
Kassen, M. (2014). Globalization of e-governance: open government as a global agenda; benefits, limitations and ways forward. Information Development, 30(1), 51-58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666912473620.
Khan, R.H. (2017). Dynamics of digital entrepreneurship and innovation: insights from an emerging market. [PhD thesis, University of Warwick].
Khan, R.H. (2022). Path Creation in ICT Innovations for Developing Countries: Evidence from a Case Study in Bangladesh, Journal of Business Administration, 43(2), 1-26.
Khan, S., Toaha, M., & Awal, M. A. (2009). Automated digital archive for land registration and records. International Technology Management Review, 2(1), 50-65.
Krueger, R.A., & Casey, M.A. (2015) Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research (5th ed). London: Sage.
Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Lijadi, A.A, & van Schalkwyk, G.J. (2015). Online Facebook focus group research of hard-to-reach participants. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 14(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406915621383
Maepa, D. N., Mpwanya, M. F., & Phume, T. B. (2023). Readiness factors affecting e-procurement in South African government departments. Journal of Transport and Supply Chain Management, 17, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.4102/ jtscm.v17i0.874
Masiero, S. (2016). The origins of failure: Seeking the causes of design–reality gaps. Information Technology for Development, 22(3), 487-502. doi: 10.1080/02681102.2016.1143346
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, LA: Sage.
Ministry of Land. (n.d.). Ministry of Land – Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh. https://minland.gov.bd/
Monga, A. (2008). E-government in India: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Administration and Governance, 3(2), 53-61.
Munshi, A., Kumar, V., & Malik, P. (2019). Digitization of land records - what we can learn from Bhoomi? Proceedings of International Conference on Advancements in Computing & Management (ICACM), 888-893. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3464213
Naderifar, M., Goli, H., & Ghaljaie, F. (2017). Snowball sampling: A purposeful method of sampling in qualitative research. Strides in Development of Medical Education, 14(3), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.5812/sdme.67670
Nahrin, K., & Rahman, M. S.-U. (2009). Land Information System (LIS) for land administration and management in Bangladesh. Journal of Bangladesh Institute of Planners, 2, 116–125. https://doi.org/10.3329/jbip.v2i0.9572
Pathak, R. D., Naz, R., Rahman, M. H., Smith, R. F. I., & Agarwal, K. N. (2009). E-Governance to cut corruption in public service delivery: A case study of Fiji. International Journal of Public Administration, 32(5), 415 - 437. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900690902799482
Prybutok, V. R., Zhang, X., & Ryan, S. D. (2008). Evaluating leadership, IT quality, and net benefits in an e-government environment. Information & Management, 45(3), 143-152.
Saif, A. N. M., & Howlader, M. S. (2018). Land e-mutation system in Bangladesh: An exploratory study of A2I program. Journal of Green Business School, 1(1), 109-118.
Sathisha & Katti, M. S. (2023). Empowering Karnataka: E-governance and transformative public administration. Research Bulletin, 49(II), 49-57.
Saunders, M. N. K., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students. New York : Pearson
Saxena, S. (2017). Factors influencing perceptions on corruption in public service delivery via e-government platform. Foresight, 19(6), 628-646. https://doi.org/10.1108/FS-05-2017-0013
Schuppan, T. (2009). E-Government in developing countries: Experiences from sub-Saharan Africa. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 118-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2008.01.006.
Sharma, P. (2016). Facts and abstracts of e-governance in India. International Journal of Commerce and Management Research, 2(11), 34–37.
Sharma, R., & Mishra, R. (2017). Investigating the role of intermediaries in adoption of public access outlets for delivery of e-Government services in developing countries: an empirical study. Government Information Quarterly, 3(4), 658-679.
Siddiquee, N. A., & Mohamed, M. Z. (2007). Paradox of public sector reforms in Malaysia: A good governance perspective. Public Administration Quarterly, 31(3), 284−312.
Siddiqui, K. (1997). Land Management in South Asia- A Comparative Study. The University Press Limited.
Singh, A. (2023). E-governance: Moving towards digital governance. Vidya-A Journal of Gujarat University, 2(1), 204-215.
Singh, G., Pathak, R.D., Naz, R., & Belwal, R. (2010). E‐governance for improved public sector service delivery in India, Ethiopia and Fiji. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 23(3), 254-275. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513551011032473
Stokes, D., & Bergin, R. (2006). Methodology or “Methodolatry”? An Evaluation of focus groups and depth interviews. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 9, 26-37. https://doi.org/10.1108/13522750610640530
Talukder, S. K., Sakib, M. I. I., & Rahman, M. M. (2014). Digital land management system: A new initiative for Bangladesh [Paper presentation]. International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Information & Communication Technology, Dhaka, Bangladesh. doi: 10.1109/ICEEICT.2014.6919031.
Terrance, M. T., & Uwizeyimana, D. E. (2023). E-governance as a new public administration paradigm. Research in Business & Social Science, 12(8), 348-356. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v12i8.2931
Venkatesh, V., Brown, S.A., & and Bala, H. (2013). Bridging the qualitative–quantitative divide: guidelines for conducting mixed methods research in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 37(1), 1-34. DOI: 10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.1.02
Venkatesh, V., Bala, H., & Sambamurthy, V. (2016). Implementation of an information and communication technology in a developing country: a multimethod longitudinal study in a bank in India. Information System Research, 27(3), 558-579. DOI: 10.1287/isre.2016.0638
Vimalkumar, M., Singh, J. B., & Sharma, S. K. (2021). Exploring the multi-level digital divide in mobile phone adoption: A comparison of developing nations. Information Systems Frontiers, 23, 1057-1076. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-020-10032-5
Walsham, G. (1995) Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method. European Journal of Information Systems, 4, 74-81.
Warschauer, M. (2004). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. MIT Press.